Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold Review: What Improved, What Didn't
Two reviews of the same phone landed within a day of each other this week, and they read like they're describing different products. MakeUseOf calls the Pixel 11 Pro Fold "the Google foldable I've always wanted", while The Verge says it "feels like the end of an era." Both verdicts hold up. They're just answering different questions, and untangling why is the point of this Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold review.
The phone goes on general sale August 20, 2026, priced at $1,899, which is $100 more than last year's model (The Verge; MakeUseOf). It's 10.1mm thick and weighs 239g, down from 10.8mm and 258g on the Pixel 10 Pro Fold (MakeUseOf). Google says that's roughly 10% lighter and about 1mm thinner than the outgoing model, with a back cover it claims is three times more durable (Google, last week).
Here's the case this article makes: Google has fixed nearly every practical complaint about its Fold line, but it fixed them inside a design philosophy, a square, book-style phone that behaves like a normal smartphone when closed, that Samsung is actively walking away from. That's not proof Google is doomed, and it isn't a claim that Apple's rumored foldable will bury it next month. It's an argument that Google has spent a generation perfecting a shape the rest of the category increasingly treats as a stepping stone, and that's a real strategic risk worth naming, not a settled failure.
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold features: what actually got fixed
The chassis complaint that dogged the last two Pixel Folds is gone. At 10.1mm and 239g, the phone now sits close to the Motorola Razr Fold's 9.89mm and 243g, thicker by a fraction of a millimeter but four grams lighter, a real shift from a device that used to feel like carrying two phones taped together (MakeUseOf).
The rest of the Pixel 11 Pro Fold improvements read like a checklist of last year's gripes. Both displays now hit 3,600 nits, a 20% brightness gain, and wireless charging jumps from 15W to 25W Qi2.2 (Google, last week). It remains the only foldable sold in the U.S. with an IP68 dust and water rating and built-in magnetic charging; Samsung's Z Fold 8 line and the Razr Fold have neither (The Verge).
On cameras, the story is a value case rather than a quality one. Packing a genuine triple-lens system at the price Samsung charges for two lenses is a legitimate spec advantage (The Verge). But the larger 48MP sensor still struggled in low light, and MakeUseOf found the overall camera system less competitive than Samsung's and Motorola's (MakeUseOf). Configuration and image quality are two different claims, and it's worth keeping them separate.
Battery capacity is one spot where the reviews don't agree. MakeUseOf lists it at 4,750mAh, while The Verge reports 4,806mAh. Both figures land below the Pixel 10 Pro Fold's 5,015mAh, which is the part that actually matters: despite the smaller cell, both outlets found the phone comfortably lasts a full day.
Add it up and this is a legitimately better Fold than what Google shipped last year. The harder question is whether "better at this shape" is still the right thing to be better at.
Pixel 11 Pro Fold vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold: two ideas of a foldable phone
Start with Google's strongest evidence for its own approach. The 6.5-inch cover screen, at a 19.5:9 ratio close to the standard Pixel 11's 20:9, drew zero complaints from MakeUseOf after nearly a week of daily use, precisely because it's designed to make you forget you're holding a foldable at all (MakeUseOf). That's the payoff of the "phone first" mantra Google adopted two years ago, which explicitly prioritized making the closed device work like an ordinary smartphone over chasing a new folded shape (Google, 2024).
The cost of that choice shows up the moment you open it. The inner display is square, with what The Verge calls "a very obvious crease," despite Google's claim that a new hinge and thicker glass layer improve crease performance (The Verge; Google, last week). An improvement isn't the same thing as parity, and for anyone who watches video or edits photos on the big screen, that crease is a daily visual interruption rather than a spec-sheet footnote.
Samsung took the opposite bet. This year it made its Z Fold lineup thinner and lighter again, nearly eliminated the crease, and introduced a new passport-shaped model that The Verge describes as feeling "like the future" (The Verge). That shape trades some cover-screen normalcy for a slimmer, less conspicuously "foldable" object in the hand.
The practical gap is measurable, not just aesthetic. Even after slimming down, the Pixel remains thicker and heavier than the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra, and at 150.4mm wide unfolded it's noticeably harder to grip one-handed than the Razr Fold (144.5mm) or the Z Fold 8 Ultra (143.2mm) (MakeUseOf). That extra width is the tradeoff for a phone-shaped closed device: you get a familiar cover screen, but the open tablet mode is bulkier to hold while reading or typing than its rivals.
Neither approach is objectively correct. Google optimized the closed-phone experience and the durability envelope; Samsung optimized the unfolded object's thinness and portability. But The Verge's own review reads Samsung's redesign as the direction the category is heading, and that reading is worth taking seriously even if it's one reviewer's interpretation rather than a market-wide verdict.
Where the "good enough" case breaks down
The strongest objection to all of this is that hardware differentiators, IP68, magnets, a third lens, are enough on their own. They aren't, mostly because the chip underneath them keeps letting the phone down. MakeUseOf's benchmarking found the Tensor G6 trailing Snapdragon chips even in AI processing, supposedly Google's home turf, and it averaged just 8.31fps in the 3DMark Steel Nomad Light stress test, a result the outlet called "extremely alarming" (MakeUseOf).
Software is meant to be the offset, and its execution is uneven in exactly the features built to prove the point. Proactive Assistance wasn't available for The Verge's UK review, and the outlet's U.S.-based colleagues testing other Pixel 11 models found it hard to trigger reliably even where it worked (The Verge). HiLight, the glowing camera-flash notification system Google is positioning as an evolving feature, currently does two things, favorite-contact calls and Gemini activity, and only works when the phone is face-down with the screen off (The Verge; Google, last week).
None of this sinks the phone by itself. Combined with a $100 price increase, though, it means buyers are being asked to pay more for durability and software advantages that aren't fully realized yet, in a shape a chunk of the market is starting to treat as the outgoing generation.
A decision rule, not a verdict
Pick the Pixel 11 Pro Fold if IP68 durability, case-free magnetic charging, a triple-camera configuration, and a cover screen that behaves like a normal phone matter more to you than raw thinness or benchmark scores. The Verge's review lands here too, pointing to the triple camera and the software layer, Camera Looks, Bubbles, Creator Suite, as real draws on top of the durability story (The Verge). That's a wider case than specs alone; it's the case for Google's whole software ecosystem riding on top of a sturdier chassis.
Pick the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra if a near-invisible crease and the thinnest, lightest unfolded object matter most, and MakeUseOf's own benchmarking backs a real performance edge there too (MakeUseOf). Pick the Razr Fold if a narrower, easier-to-grip-open frame is the priority; it's slightly thinner and, at 243g, only marginally heavier than the Pixel's 239g, so weight isn't really the deciding factor there, footprint is.
Google didn't fail to execute. It executed its "phone first" philosophy about as well as it can be executed, closing the gap on chassis weight, brightness, and charging speed in a single generation. The risk isn't that the Pixel 11 Pro Fold is a bad phone. It's that at least one influential reviewer sees the category's center of gravity moving toward Samsung's thinner, lower-crease answer, right as Google finishes polishing the alternative.
Apple entering the foldable market next month, as The Verge notes is rumored, is worth flagging as competitive pressure rather than treating as evidence of anything (The Verge). The more useful test is closer to home: does Google's next redesign attack the crease and the unfolded footprint the way this one attacked thickness and weight? That answer, not any rival's roadmap, will decide whether "phone first" still makes sense as a foldable strategy, or whether Google finds itself very good at building yesterday's best Android foldable phone.
Comments
Be the first, drop a comment!